Home










2 August 2006

As promised, I've been working to organize an event called "Make Music New York", one day a year where anyone can take to the streets and play music. Although the website isn't completely set up yet, you can watch a two minute video here explaining the Fete de la Musique in Paris, on which "Make Music New York" is based. Please join us in the streets next year!


5 March 2006

After banning the sale and installation of certain car alarms in 2004, New York's City Council recently passed Mayor Bloomberg's proposal to overhaul the City's noise code. With the legislative process played out, I've stopped working on noise issues, at least for now.

But people keep emailing me. They want to know how to solve their local noise problems, or what to do about the car alarm outside their apartment that just won't stop. For this later group, I have created a new page with a few tips on how to fight back against car alarms in your neighborhood. Check it out.

To get in touch with people still combating noise, please take a look at the groups listed here (at the bottom of the page).

As for me, I'm beginning to focus on improving the soundscape in other ways, by starting a New York music festival modeled after the French "Fete de la Musique". Send me an email if you're interested in this project.

Finally, I'd like to thank everyone who got involved with the car alarm campaign, especially Mike Infranco, Rory Bernstein, Nina Teicholz, Drew Robertson, Tico Taussig, Aaron Naparstek, Harold Takooshian, Arline Bronzaft, Les Blomberg, Richard Tur, Irma Bauman, and everyone at Transportation Alternatives. You guys are incredible.


8 September 2005

The Silent Majority website, from time to time, has concerned itself with Darrell Issa: the car thief turned car alarm magnate turned Congressman. Now, according to an article this week in Roll Call,
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) "shocked his staff when he showed up at an office whitewater tubing outing wearing bikini briefs".
I couldn't get access to the original article, so I'm not sure if this was meant as some kind of suggestion for hurricane relief or what.

Meanwhile, the New York Democratic primary is on Tuesday, Sept. 13th. Once again, I urge you to support Eva Moskowitz for Manhattan BP (as endorsed this week by the Daily News). Eva did great work on noise issues in the Council, and is the one politician in New York who will return your phone calls! For that reason alone she deserves your support.


13 June 2005

Eleven candidates, some quite well-known, have announced their intention to run for Manhattan Borough President this September. With so many candidates splitting the field, just a few votes one way or the other could determine the outcome.

(Whether the position itself makes any difference is another question. The candidates are likely to spend at least $10 million to attain a position with a 2005 budget of about $3 million -- which is less than 1/100th of one percent of the city's $46.9 billion annual budget. Most likely the candidates are running to maintain some kind of public profile as they await more important races.)

Anyway, I'm writing to put in a good word for one of the candidates: Eva Moskowitz. As you will recall, Moskowitz introduced Int. 115, the anti-car alarm bill that made sense and could have really made New York quieter. She used her staff's time to push the issue through committees, pick up co-sponsors, and generally champion the idea. In the end, when it looked like there was no other choice, she compromised and supported a much weaker bill, which passed last year. Without her original bill and her efforts, this never would have happened.

If you supported Moskowitz's car alarm work, I encourage you to show your gratitude by volunteering on her Campaign for Borough President. You could show up for two hours on some Tuesday evening between now and September, have a good time, and perhaps pave the way for Mayor Moskowitz to do away with car alarms once and for all!


24 January 2005

For the past seven months, I've been in Wisconsin, far from the car alarms of New York. (I was working on the presidential campaign, then waiting for my New York subletter to leave.)

Now I'm back, and I wanted to write a brief update on the car alarm campaign, and let everyone know about Wednesday's City Council hearing on the new noise code.

What happened to the bill to ban car alarms?

On June 10th last year, the City Council held a hearing on Int. 81, a bill to ban the sale and installation of audible car alarms in New York City. Such a bill, as I've argued repeatedly, would do little to stop the noise, since the alarms would remain legal to use and easy to purchase outside the City. But perhaps this sort of ban would be better than nothing.

Councilman James Gennaro chaired the hearing, and began by suggesting that this weak ban was, in fact, too strong. He argued that all we needed was a ban on the sale of alarms activated by movement or vibrations (use of these alarms is already illegal). Perhaps these particular alarms are the worst offenders, but the whole point is to create a law that is actually enforceable, and do the NYPD or Department of Consumer Affairs know enough about car alarm technology to enforce this distinction at the point of sale?

Well, I suppose we'll find out. On June 28th, one day after another anti-car-alarm editorial in the New York Times, Int. 81 became Int. 81-A (reflecting Gennaro's changes), and was passed through the Environmental Protection Committee. The full Council passed the bill three weeks later, with only Councilmembers Tony Avella and Erik Martin Dilan voting against it. Mayor Bloomberg opposed the bill, but the Council overrode his veto on September 28th. At the end of November, the law took effect.

Wednesday's City Council Hearing

The Council has played its car alarm hand. Meanwhile, Mayor Bloomberg has introduced his proposal (available here, or here as a pdf) to revamp New York's noise code. This far-reaching bill, among many other things, would ask the Department of Environmental Protection, "in conjunction with the police department," to "study noise abatement strategies for audible motor vehicle burglar alarms" and to "report his or her findings and recommendations to the mayor" (section 24-205 (c)).

Our task now is to move this legislation out of the Council, so that the DEP can begin work on this study. Although there might not be time for the public at large to testify, it would be nice to show the Councilmembers that their constituents are interested enough in this issue to show up. I hope to see you there on Wednesday!
Date: Wednesday, January 26
Time: 10 AM
Location: Council Chambers -- City Hall


9 June 2004

Tomorrow morning, the City Council is holding a hearing on a weak bill to regulate car alarms. We need to come out one more time to City Hall, and make it clear that New Yorkers will not rest until we get a full ban on the USE of car alarm sirens. Arrive early to sign up to testify. Even if you do not want to testify, we still need you there to hold signs (provided) and to send a strong message to the Council.
Date: Thursday, June 10th, 2004
Time: 10 AM
Location: Council Chambers of City Hall


8 June 2004

On Monday, Mayor Bloomberg announced his proposal to revise New York's Noise Code. This is a very important effort to quiet the city -- but (you're surely wondering) what will it do about car alarms?

The noise code revisions do not ban car alarms. This is disappointing, given the severity of the car alarm problem and the popular support for a ban.

On the other hand, the noise code revisions would create a study on the feasibility of banning alarms. This study could persuade the NYPD and the Mayor that we have nothing to fear from such a ban. We may have to wait a few more months, but the car alarm ban is still on the table. And we have an excellent chance of passing it, one way or another.

Three new editorials make the case for a full car alarm ban:
New York Press, Way to Legislate, June 2-8, 2004

New York Observer, Ban Car Alarms, June 7, 2004

New York Times, Shushing the Big City, June 9, 2004

28 May 2004

I want to thank everyone who made it to Tuesday's rally against car alarms. Over fifty people came, enough to prompt articles in the New York Times, New York Daily News, New York Post, and amNewYork, radio stories on WABC, WNYC, WFUV, and television coverage on WNBC, WABC, and UPN. Thanks for making this event such a success!

The politics of a New York car alarm ban have suddenly grown more complicated. On Monday, the City Council announced a June 10th, 2004 hearing on Int. 81, John Liu's bill to ban the sale and installation of new car alarm sirens. Unfortunately, Int. 81 does not ban car alarm use. It would allow any driver to use a noisy car alarm, as long as it was purchased outside the City (and most of them are). Though well intentioned, Int. 81 would not solve New York's car alarm problem. As you probably know, we are pushing for a bill like Int. 115, which would ban car alarm use completely.

City Council Speaker Gifford Miller still claims that we can't ban car alarm use, because turning off existing alarms is too difficult. But this simply isn't true. He has written this letter explaining his position, which we have annotated. See also our memo on how to turn off alarms.

Please contact Miller and explain why we need a complete car alarm ban.


14 May 2004

Speaker Gifford Miller refuses to move ahead with the City Council's car alarm ban. He's been obstructing the bill for eight months.

Enough is enough. Please join us on May 25th to rally in support of the ban.


11 May 2004

A few odds and ends...

Although I didn't notice it at the time, our car alarm campaign was the subject of this cover story in AutoMedia magazine last August. The cover shows a cartoon of a typical car thief (a blonde woman wearing a bodysuit that accentuates her cleavage) stealing a car radio while some kind of purple ogre stands watch. Maybe you have to see it to believe it.

Rory Kerber has a photo essay on a car alarm incident up on her website.

And artist Sharon Gilbert's book about noise is featured in the Brooklyn Museum's "Open House: Working in Brooklyn", now through August 15.


1 May 2004

Last week's West Side Spirit devoted its front page to an article about car alarms. An excerpt:
"We have sort of reached an agreement on sort of merging them and modifying them," Moskowitz said of the two bills [to ban car alarms]. "I would expect in early June that this would have a second hearing."

Moskowitz added that with "tremendous support" among her colleagues, it's likely that the ban could win passage by the end of the year.

If the City Council passes a bill on car alarms, it would go to the mayor for his signature.

"Obviously, the mayor finds loud and egregious noise to be a major offense and affront that people should not have to live with," said Chris Coffey, a Spokesman for Mayor Michael Bloomberg. "But we do not comment on any pending legislation."


29 April 2004

Many people have asked about the insurance discount New York drivers receive for having a car alarm. In order to clear up this confusing issue, I've put together a short memo. The bottom line: The car alarm discount amounts to $10-$20 a year, even less for low-income drivers. Silent devices, such as immobilizers or tracking systems, earn their owners much larger discounts (two to three times as much). Motorists would gain better protection and bigger savings by switching from car alarms to these more effective devices.

I've also put up the text of the current law on car alarms in New York City. As you'll quickly see, it has a few problems:
  • Police have better things to do than to stand around for three minutes timing alarm noises (as required in 24-221 (d)).
  • Police cannot easily verify that an alarm was set off by vibration or motion sensors, rather than by direct physical contact (24-221 (d)). The only way to tell for sure is to dismantle the car.
  • No mechanism even exists for registering one's car with the local police precinct, as 24-221 (g) requires.
  • Eva Moskowitz's Int. 115, by contrast, allows a clear, easily understood rule for ticketing. Enforcement agents would be able to give tickets efficiently; drivers would know how to avoid them.

    Manhattann Community Boards 2 and 3 each passed resolutions this week supporting a car alarm ban. Thanks again to Mike "The Machine" Infranco!


    22 April 2004

    I highly recommend today's front-page LA Times article about traffic noise (also available here). The good news: Japan is requiring its cars to become 50% quieter in the next few years. The bad news: in America, the problem's getting worse.


    21 April 2004

    Car alarms, it turns out, are not the only bad way to protect your car. Here's a list of other devices I wish I had never heard about (scroll down all the way). Not to mention this article about noise as a battlefield weapon.


    19 April 2004

    We're starting a new campaign to publicize the harmful effects of noise on children -- download the flier from the Kids and Car Alarms page and spread the word!

    Last week, Community Board 6 (Manhattan) became the latest CB to formally endorse the car alarm ban. Thanks to Mike Infranco for leading the charge.

    We also have new press clips from amNewYork (here and here) and from the Christian Science Monitor.


    2 April 2004

    A new Time Magazine article about noise mentions the Purdue University Institute for Safe, Quiet, and Durable Highways. These researchers have figured out ways to reduce traffic noise at its source -- where the rubber hits the road. They've also looked at the effectiveness of sound absorptive barriers alongside highways. Check it out.

    We have two more press clips this week, from the New York Times and the National Post (Canada).


    26 March 2004

    Many people have wondered how motorists can turn off their factory installed alarms. Here is the answer. Around 97% of factory installed alarms (and 100% of the others) can be switched off by the driver. It's simple. See the document for details.

    I've also put online the famous Highway Loss Data Institute study on preventing motor vehicle theft. It's available here. Conclusion: Alarms don't work.

    We also have new press clips from the New York Times, New York Post, and Manhattan Times. And this video clip about the Trunk Monkey Theft Retrieval System -- not to be missed!


    16 March 2004
    Stillman, speaking before a packed courtroom and often over the relentless sound of a car alarm from outside, asked the jury to ignore many of the salacious details of the case. "It's not about someone's lifestyle or spending habits," he said. "I beg you to stay focused."
    -- "Closing Arguments Begin In Tyco Trial", Dow Jones Newswire, March 8, 2004.

    A few odds and ends: I've added a list of factory-installed immobilizers to the Alarm Alternatives page...updated the Get Involved section...added Mad Magazine's car alarm cartoons...and put all the videos in one place (including the famous car alarm scene from "When a Man Loves A Woman").


    4 March 2004

    Community Board 12 (Manhattan) resolved last week to support the car alarm ban. Here's the text of their resolution, which passed 27-1:
    WHEREAS, Complaints about noise are the leading type of complaint called into the city's 311 central complaint line by residents of Washington Heights-Inwood; and

    WHEREAS, Audible car alarms are a major cause of such complaints and have been described by the New York Police Department as an "annoying and sometimes unbearable disturbance for residents in their homes"; and

    WHEREAS, Vehicles with such alarms show "no overall reduction in theft losses" compared with vehicles without alarms, according to a study of 73 million vehicles by the Highway Loss Data Institute; and

    WHEREAS, Over 50 New York City car alarm installation companies have pledged to disable car alarm sirens without cost, if they are banned; and

    WHEREAS, Car owners can readily protect their vehicles with many affordable and truly effective silent devices, which immobilize cars or page motorists directly; and

    WHEREAS, Int. 115, introduced in the City Council by Council Member Eva Moskowitz, would ban the installation, sale and use of car alarms in the five boroughs of New York City and grant authority to the Police Department to enforce its provisions; and

    WHEREAS, The State Insurance Law requires insurance companies to provide an automatic discount to owners of cars equipped with anti-theft devices, including audible car alarms; now

    THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED That Community Board 12-Manhattan urges the City Council to enact Int. 115 into law at its earliest possible opportunity; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That Community Board 12-Manhattan calls upon the State Legislature to amend the State Insurance Law to remove the automatic discount afforded to owners of cars in New York City with audible alarms.

    Also new this week -- another editorial in the Norwood News (Bronx) supporting a car alarm ban.


    20 February 2004

    Another car alarm parody joins our collection, this one called "A Push to Upgrade Car Alarms".

    Nelson Smith wrote about car alarms in a 1997 essay for The Baffler magazine, reprinted last year in "Boob Jubilee: The Mad Cultural Politics of the New Economy". A short excerpt from this fascinating piece:
    The car alarm intones a central irony in the history of alarm technology. The automobile itself, as we know, represented the mechanical triumph of individual over collective. Enthroned in his roaming, honking intransigence, the motorist becomes a creature against all others. With alarms, this territorial self-acclaim can be sustained even when the motorist has called it a day. The early horn-triggering alarms of the seventies clearly evinced this surrogate function, emitting an autistically methodical honk like an enraged driver pounding his forehead on the horn. As later car alarms grew more ubiquitous and expressive, filling neighborhoods with their now-familiar idiom of whooooops, dweeeeps, and whirligig wails, they clearly demonstrated a paradox evident in so many areas of human progress: that our achievements tend to expand to the point of their own self-diminishment. Here the very line of technology first designed to protect the sanctity of the home has evolved into that sanctum's most persistent disrupter.

    [...]

    In the end, we grow inured. For who today actually responds to these mechanical invokers of civic duty? When a car alarm shrieks under our window at night, don't we all simply curse, pack the pillows over our ears, and burrow back to sleep?...sleeping until startled awake by yet another alarm: the peep, jingle, or buzz of our bedside alarm clock, that most intimate of all security devices, the alarm by which property itself secures our daily labor, guarding its ever-expanding claims against the trespass of our dreams."


    18 February 2004

    Last night's WNBC story on car alarms, in case you missed it, is available here.

    In other news, Newsweek has a good article about noise and the proposed 9/11 memorial.


    16 February 2004

    Lots of news this week:

  • Tonight on the local NBC News, Ralph Penza will report on the movement to ban car alarms. Many Silent Majority people were filmed for this segment -- tune in at 11 PM to watch.

  • Council members John Liu and Eva Moskowitz have reintroduced their car alarm proposals for the new legislative session. Liu's bill is now Int. 81; Moskowitz's bill is now Int. 115. As far as I can tell, they are identical to last year's versions. Liu's bill would ban the sale and installation of audible car alarms in New York City; Moskowitz's bill would ban their sale, installation, and use, with a stronger enforcement mechanism. Neither bill will move forward until Gifford Miller schedules a final hearing on them.

  • If there's not enough car alarm-related amusement in your life, check out this cartoon from the latest New Yorker, and this classic satire from The Onion.

  • Nathan Thompson has put together a 30-second advertisement on the effects of car alarms. We don't have the money to broadcast it, but you can watch it here.

  • Chad DeChant sends a recent local news story about "Whistle Tips," yet another obnoxiously loud auto accessory.

  • Stories about our movement have recently appeared on BBC Channel 3 (UK), Italian public television, and on BBC Brasil. Can anyone here read Portuguese?

  • We're working on getting New York's Community Boards to pass resolutions endorsing the car alarm bills. CB3 in Queens already has; CB12 in Manhattan passed a resolution through its committee last week; four other boards are considering it. Please email me if you want to get involved in this project.



  • 28 January 2004

    The Edmonton Journal published an article yesterday about car alarms, containing this wonderful exchange with a police constable:
    The Edmonton Police Service doesn't even respond to calls about car alarms as "crimes in progress" anymore. They treat them as noise complaints.

    "They are crap," says Const. Terry Jordan, alarm program co-ordinator for the police service's crime prevention unit.

    "Inherently, the audible car alarms, they're so common now that people just ignore them. All it takes is a minor wind vibration to trigger them. They don't have the deterrent value people seem to think."

    Watch what happens, says Jordan, when an alarm goes off in a parkade or outside a mall. No one rushes to the rescue.

    "People say, 'Just another damned car alarm,' and walk away."

    I asked the constable if he'd heard of one case where a theft was foiled or a thief caught because of a car alarm. There was a long pause while he thought.

    "Not that I recall."

    One time, Jordan says, he responded to a car alarm and found a car with a broken window. But he couldn't tell whether the window had been broken by a would-be thief -- or by someone who just got frustrated, listening to the alarm ring on and on.
    Police in New York tell me the same things, not surprisingly. Will a curious reporter ever get them to say so on the record?


    19 January 2004

    I've reorganized the Press Clips section to make articles easier to find. (Scroll down for the latest car alarm news from Canada.) Also, Rodger Stevens is now making his anti-car alarm T-shirt available online.


    14 January 2004

    Vancouver (BC) might ban car alarms by this summer (see here, here, and here). Rep. Galen Fox will soon introduce a bill to ban car alarms in Hawaii.

    Will your city be next?


    12 January 2004

    In the course of wondering how Jewish law might deal with car alarms, this New York Times article yesterday notes:
    James Gennaro, the councilman who represents the area, has proposed a remedy that would ease the problem throughout the city. He is chairman of the Council's Environmental Protection Committee, which is ushering through two bills - introduced by Council members John C. Liu from Queens and Eva S. Moskowitz from Manhattan - that would ban the sale and installation of audible alarms in the city. A final hearing on the Council measures could be held as early as this month, but their passage is uncertain. The Bloomberg administration so far has sided with car alarm manufacturers.
    For months, press coverage of the car alarm legislation has focussed on its provision to ban the sale and installation of alarms. That's hardly the whole story! In its current form, the bill would require car owners to turn off their existing alarms, and it would give citizens a way to file alarm complaints. These measures promise to improve the car alarm problem immediately -- but for some reason, most reporters and Council members aren't discussing them.


    10 January 2004

    Councilmember Eva Moskowitz gave an interview last month for Boston public radio about New York's car alarm problem.

    Meanwhile, in Beijing...


    7 January 2004

    I've updated the site with a better-organized Resources section, more information on immobilizers, eleven new car alarm stories, and an mp3 of the famous car alarm mockingbird. I hope to see you at the Meetup on Tuesday!


    1 January 2004

    It seems that a new Car Alarm MeetUp is forming. Sign up if you're interested in bringing car alarm relief to your city, wherever you may be. (Information about MeetUps here.)

    In other news, a new article discusses the Parisian way of mapping traffic noise and working to reduce it. A very interesting concept, which echoes New York's CompStat program.

    Finally, John Lipman sends his epic car alarm poem:

    TO A CAR ALARM

    Oh, five-boroughed New Yorker, Speak, if ever you have heard
    Of a car alarm going off that has in fact deterred
    A car thief or a felon or one of their unlawful kin
    Or do these things just go off on their own idiosyncratic whim?

    Oh, Mars, bring me my shoulder launched missile or rocket propelled grenade
    So I might end this block-disturbing, sleep-depriving, ululating serenade
    And the absent auto owner would return and he would find
    Blackened
    Twisted
    Bent
    Warped
    Pulverized
    Pounded
    Powdered
    Minced
    Smiterenized
    Metallic bits of the "this-was-once-my-poor-car" kind

    Let him write his insurance company and submit in triplicate
    Photos, affidavits, and his dear late car's obit
    And while waiting for the check
    Let him ride on Mass Transit




    29 December 2003

    The New Yorker profiles the anti-alarm movement (and this site) in today's Talk of the Town.

    The article mentions that a new car alarm hearing is scheduled for February, while the New York Times's car alarm editorial had said January. In any case, the hearing is coming up, and I will give you the official date as soon as it is scheduled.


    15 December 2003

    Today the New York Times runs an important editorial supporting a car alarm ban. It's just the latest in a series of good articles this week, which include these op-eds in the New York Times and the Brooklyn Skyline, and a great editorial from Texas, from which I quote:
    The world has become full of stupid devices that are supposed to make our lives simpler, safer, better. When one of them proves not to work, there's no reason to keep going along with it just because it is there. We applaud the New Yorkers who are pushing to get rid of this senseless noise. Their effort may go down as New York's greatest contribution to civilized life since the bagel.

    2 December 2003

    Bad news today: the final car alarm hearing, originally scheduled for December 11th, has been postponed. But it's not the end of the world. Learn more here.


    27 November 2003

    We're only two weeks away from the car alarm hearing! I've put together two posters for you to distribute to your neighbors or post around town. Please spread the word and come out on December 11th!

    In other car alarm news, an article by Micah Sheveloff in September's Audio Video International looks at the 12-volt industry's response to noise legislation. And here's what Calvin Trillan has to say about car alarms:
    Do you have problems with car alarms?

    We do, at least on Saturday nights, when the Village becomes what we sometimes call "Jerseyated." It's a wonderful time to rob houses in Ridgefield. They're constantly going off around here. I think there should be a definite rule about car alarms: You should have the right to break the window and turn it off.
    -- Calvin Trillan, in "The Portable Curmudgeon," (ed. John Winokur) pp. 82


    2 November 2003

    A new article on "Insomnia, politically induced" reminisces about the car alarms Darrell Issa hath wrought.


    24 October 2003

    The official transcript of the June 11th car alarm hearing is now available here, as a pdf. For those who couldn't be there in person, a few highlights:

    Councilmember John Liu:
    No one is making it difficult for people to protect their cars; we certainly want to combat auto theft, which itself is a problem. The question at hand is whether car alarms actually reduce any kind of auto theft in any way. I submit to you that based on the research that I've conducted, there is no measurable impact that car alarms actually have on reducing auto theft...

    Today noisy car alarms simply don't do the job; they're ignored by everybody on the street, they're ignored by people in the buildings, they're ignored by the cops. The only time that they are paid attention to is at 3:00 in the morning, when a car alarm goes off for no apparent reason and wakes up everybody in the neighborhood. That is the problem that we're trying to address today...

    I will tell you that the cops in my area don't pay any attention to them. They told me that these alarms don't work, and they just bother people. I would challenge both of your departments to sit down with Council Member Moskowitz and Chairman Gennaro and myself and our colleagues, and let's randomly pick out a street near a police precinct in New York City. I will personally walk down that street and yell "boo" at a few cars to set off their alarms, and let's see how many cops actually pay attention to that.
    Councilmember Eva Moskowitz:
    Car alarms in 99% of the cases are set off by people walking by. It's hard to say if the product is defective or what the issue is, but noise complaints are the single largest area of complaints that the Mayor's new 311 number receiving. I chair the Education Committee, the schools are in crises, we have health care issues, we have many, many issues, and yet the fact that New Yorkers take out the time, because they are being driven crazy by these blaring alarms, I think makes a very, very profound statement...

    Let's just suppose that two thefts were prevented a year by car alarms, would that be valuable enough to have thousands of New Yorkers not getting any sleep?

    ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PETITO [from the NYPD]: I think that would end up being a discussion, a judgment, a balancing of interests between the Council...

    COUNCIL MEMBER MOSKOWITZ: You need a discussion if there are two car thefts in the City of New York that are prevented by car alarms? Two? I'm giving a hypothetical, I understand, but two in a City of eight million New Yorkers, it's the position of the Police Department that you would need to have a discussion?
    Councilmember James Gennaro:
    With regard to enforcement of car alarms, do we have any sense of how many violations have been issued for car alarms, both from the PD and the DEP?

    ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PETITO: From the PD, we issued 196 car alarm [Environmental Control Board] summonses in 2002.

    CHAIRPERSON GENNARO: One hundred ninety-six? You could do that in my district in one night.
    Henry J. Stern, NY Civic:
    The car alarm is ridiculous because it's obsolete. If there was a medicine that (say) cured one person but made 1,000 other people suffer, do you think that medicine would be allowed to be sold? It's absurd.

    The principal impact of car alarms is to harass and disturb and annoy, vex, molest, degrade, frighten the innocent. Little children are woken up at night, they cry, they don't know what it is. People are trying to get to sleep, they can't, they're bad the next day, they have accidents because they didn't get a decent night's sleep...This is more than a whim or a luxury; sleep is a basic necessity of life...Remember Coleridge, The Ancient Mariner, "Oh Sleep, it is a gentle thing, beloved from Pole to Pole. To Mary Queen, let praise begin...it benefits the soul." It's sleep, it's not a whim...

    It's an absurdity in this day and age, in the year 2003, which I've lived to see. If you want to stop theft, you have a little bottom that you press; this is the computer age. The town crier is gone. You don't have to scream and wake up the whole neighborhood just because someone is trying to steal a car. That's ridiculous. It's totally obsolete.
    Thanks to Ron Bach for sending this transcript along.


    10 October 2003

    Some background on the Australian movement to ban car alarms in Queensland:

    Last year, the Crime Research Centre at the University of Western Australia found that the rate of motor vehicle theft in Western Australia had declined by 41 percent since 1995, much more than in the rest of the country. Why did this happen? Because of the introduction of car engine immobilisers. These devices became mandatory in 1999 for every registered vehicle. Today, they are the only anti-theft devices recommended by the National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council (NMVTRC).

    Meanwhile, the antiquated car alarms are still causing trouble. On May 19, 2003, the Australian insurance company AAMI reported that 79 percent of Australians believe that "nobody pays much attention to car alarms nowadays because they often go off accidentally."


    6 October 2003

    New York's City Council has scheduled a second car alarm hearing! This is great news: if all goes well, we could have a car alarm ban on the books by the end of the year. More details to come...


    3 October 2003

    News from Australia: Councillor David Hinchliffe is leading the fight to ban car alarms in Brisbane.


    2 October 2003

    For a long time, I've heard the suggestion that car alarms should trigger a call to your cell phone, instead of waking up the neighborhood with a siren. Now this idea seems to be a reality.


    30 September 2003

    The American Automobile Association editorializes this month about the car alarm proposals in City Council, in their Car and Travel magazine. They support a car alarm ban, but not the pending legislation (Int. 448), which they fear is
    unfair to those car owners who spent considerable money on an anti-theft device that was not only legal at the time of purchase but actually encouraged through the mechanism of insurance deductions.
    Why is it unfair to make car owners responsible for the use of their alarms? Isn't it unfair, rather, to give them a false sense of security that their alarms really work? Int. 448 is not a financial burden on car owners, who can temporarily disable their alarms at no cost to themselves. And it does not compromise auto security, since the alarms do nothing to stop theft.

    The AAA also worries that police could issue car alarm violations based solely on citizen complaints. The press reports have been confusing, but Int. 448 is clear: complaints alone are not prima facie evidence of a violation. Complaints can lead the police to mail out warning letters to car owners, but not (by themselves) to issue tickets. The police department of Savannah, Ga., has adopted this strategy to deal with loud car stereos, and it seems to work.


    20 September 2003

    We're making great progress in the fight against car alarms. Nate Hutcheson is forming a group in Chicago to bring car alarm relief to the Second City. Hawaii's State Legislature is considering a bill to require (silent) pager alarms. And the Noise Pollution Clearinghouse is joining us to spread the word nationally. No matter where you are, if car alarm noise is a problem you want to address, send me an email and we can talk about it.

    Here in New York, the campaign is going very well. More and more installers are supporting a car alarm ban, since they realize that their business will improve -- this memo explains how. Now Council staffers are planning to hold a second hearing on a combined car alarm bill, scheduled for around the end of October. We should have an exact date next week. Sign up for email alerts to learn how you can make your voice heard at the hearing.


    19 September 2003

    Car alarms in the news:
    "Car alarms went off, like demons released from the earth".
    -- James Ganz in The New York Times, Sept. 7, 2003
    Seattle Police Department Detective Gene McNaughton of the Auto Theft Squad notes that thieves have been known to hook up to a tow truck and haul off the vehicle, with the alarm blaring. "Most people don't look twice at a car being hooked up and towed away. We've become desensitized to car alarms."
    -- Paul Shukovsky in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, June 9, 2003

    30 August 2003

    From a column in yesterday's Salon.com:
    Fifty years ago one would have described the bizarre warbled yelping of the gibbon as "unearthly." Today we say "it sounds like a car alarm." Through technology we've managed to completely invert nature, never mind entirely isolate ourselves from it. The unearthly now wholly earthly -- the proud product of some very organic human tinkering, yet simultaneously alienated from all that is natural. Who says of the car alarm: "It sounds just like a gibbon"?
    (Story here, requires subscription.)

    I can't imagine that the gibbon emits the universally despised 6-tone siren. That distinction belongs to the mockingbird, according to two correspondents from Brooklyn:
    "I was at a dinner party in Cobble Hill over the weekend and the hosts described how one day they heard an odd car alarm - it didn't sound quite right, so they went out to investigate. A mockingbird was in their backyard running through the entire rotation of car alarm sounds - and kept it up for about 15 minutes."

    "I had hoped to speak the other day about the mockingbird that lives across the street from me. Clearly, and unmistakably, it sings, or rather mocks to the tune of car alarms. Even nature herself is mocking our stupidity."
    A reporter has called me to ask about the history and impact of this ubiquitous siren. If anyone has further stories to share, send me an email and I'll put you in touch with her.

    (Incidentally, people have been teaching human songs to birds for a long time. Witness this 18th-century bird organ, or the flageolet music in The Bird Fancyers Delight (1717).)


    11 August 2003

    From the February 20, 2002 Late Show with David Letterman, as read by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the "Top Ten Ways I'll Improve New York City":

    10. I'll personally pay every New Yorker's rent for the next four years
    9. Get caught jaywalking and we'll impound your shoes
    8. Once a week a different New Yorker has to mow Central Park
    7. Subway cars now equipped with a complimentary all-you-can-eat soup and salad bar
    6. Every weekend bare-knuckle boxing matches on front lawn of Gracie Mansion
    5. Free full-body massages from your cabbie
    4. I'm renaming the city "Funkytown"
    3. Mandatory ten o'clock curfew for Bill Clinton
    2. If a car alarm goes off, call me and I'll personally come and tow it
    1. Okay, Arizona, you had your fun -- now we're coming to get our World Series trophy


    30 July 2003

    Lots of new links and information this week:

  • The Moscow City Council banned car alarms earlier this month. "'People cannot protect their property at the cost of sacrificing the peace and health of others,' council deputy speaker Oleg Bocharov was quoted as saying." Some tell me that car alarms are illegal in Switzerland -- does anyone know more?

  • Tom and Ray of NPR's Car Talk hate car alarms (they recommend a kill switch instead).

  • Eva Moskowitz was interviewed about her car alarm bill in Time Out Magazine on page 6 (sorry, no link).

  • The Times Newsweekly of Queens ran this editorial against car alarms.

  • My interview about car alarms on WFUV 90.7 FM is now available as an mp3. The alarm industry spokesman you hear is Ken Gammage, who wrote this "nut job" letter to the editor of the City Journal, in response to Brian Anderson's "Let's Ban Car Alarms".

  • Finally, the Consumer Electronics Association reports on their testimony at last month's car alarm hearing.



  • 18 July 2003

    Could our efforts spark car alarm bans in the rest of the country? What about in suburban Philadelphia, where the Morning Call newspaper runs this story (with sidebar) on our New York campaign?

    The car alarm industry does not have unlimited resources for lobbying. What if we hit them in lots of different cities at once?


    11 July 2003

    The City Journal has a new alarm story today. As they rightly point out, Brian Anderson's 2002 article "Let's Ban Car Alarms" has been a lodestar and inspiration for all of our work so far.


    9 July 2003

    The Tri-State Transportation Campaign replies to Douglas Johnson's car alarm op-ed in this letter (scroll all the way down).


    8 July 2003

    My colleague Aaron Naparstek (from Transportation Alternatives) has a car alarm op-ed in today's New York Daily News, with a counterpoint by electronics industry spokesman Douglas Johnson. Notice how Johnson slides from defending the need for "anti-theft devices" (and who would disagree?) to defending car alarms. That's why he gets the big bucks...


    7 July 2003

    The Gotham Gazette runs this article today on the new car alarm bills. This compliments their great article last year on noise in New York City (an article which elicited lots of car alarm comments on their message board).


    3 July 2003

    I've finally posted the car alarm stories I've been getting from New Yorkers like you. Some were sent to me by visitors to this site; most are from the T.A. car alarm survey. If you have a car alarm story you'd like to share, send it to aaron@silentmajorityny.org.

    There's also a new section gathering together the press clips from this campaign.

    Next week, look for a car alarm op-ed in the New York Daily News, and a story in the Gotham Gazette. Stay tuned...


    26 June 2003

    This week brings more news about Darrell Issa -- founder of Directed Electronics, Republican congressman...and three-time car thief?

    Car alarms are also getting coverage in the Queens Gazette. First a small article about John Liu (D-Queens) and his car alarm bill...then a longer opinion piece by Steven Walker called "Car Alarm Menace Ruins Quality Of Life" (not available online). The Queens Gazette also wrote this editorial three years ago in support of a car alarm ban.

    Finally, Aaron Naparstek has discovered this interview with John Tierney, one of the earliest crusaders against car alarms. An excerpt:
    Have you experienced any of the scenarios that appear in that book?
    All of them! (Laughs.) I've done the car-alarm one ("How To Proceed When You Discover Which Car's Alarm Keeps Going Off in the Middle of the Night"). I actually found out whose car alarm was going off in the middle of the night, traced their license plate and started calling them up in the middle of the night myself. And the ones I couldn't find phone numbers for, I went out and started ringing their doorbells, just saying, 'So, how's your car? I want to make sure it's safe. We're all worried about your car.' And so they were just so angry.


    19 June 2003

    Ann-Marie Tesar writes

    I think you should have a section of your website devoted to people's miserable experiences with car alarms.

    This is a great idea. I seem to be a magnet for these stories, and people have already sent me a few. Even more often, someone calls me from San Francisco and says

    YOU HEAR THAT? I WAS JUST ABOUT TO HAVE MY LUNCH AND THEN A CAR ALARM STARTED GOING OFF. THAT'S WHY I'M SHOUTING INTO THE PHONE.

    Every week in Washington Heights, I hear about 60 car alarms -- plus another three, broadcast by phone from my friends across the country. Thanks, guys. Anyway, as soon as I get in touch with my lovely web designer Rory Kerber, I'll put up a section for you to tell your car alarm stories. Send them to aaron@silentmajorityny.org

    Today, we have some more press links. John Liu's car alarm bill gets a brief mention here in the Western Queens Gazette (scroll down)...the Tri-State Transportation Campaign digs into Bloomberg for his Administration's performance at Wednesday's car alarm hearing...and WLIB 1190 AM put the following on their website:

    Car Alarms To Be Banned?
    The city council is considering whether to ban car alarmsŠ to make the city a lot quieter. The legislation would fine people as much as 2,000 dollars if they refuse to turn off the wailing outdated horns. Residents testified before the city leaders yesterday, saying the old car alarms are outdated, and there's new technology that silently kills ignitions and even sends messages to cell phones and pagers.


    Now for the most interesting item: a press release from Directed Electronics, explaining how they're going to fight these City Council car alarm bills. Among other things, the company claims that

    "The National Insurance Crime Bureau recommends that consumers purchase as audible alarm as a valuable layer of protection against car theft," says Bean. "The insurance industry believes that car alarms work, and so do we. Directed will continue working with local New York City businesses, the CEA and other manufacturers in a grass roots effort to oppose this initiative."

    A few comments:

    I spoke with Ed Sparkman at the NICB four or five times while doing research for "Alarmingly Useless". The first time we talked, I asked him: Does the NICB recommend the use of audible alarms?

    He answered that the NICB is not in the business of recommending or discommending anything. They take the position that whatever it is, it can't hurt. But they have no data on what works and what doesn't. For that, he referred me to the Highway Loss Data Institute.

    And HLDI, of course, is the insurance industry group which says that alarms are useless. So it's hard to defend the claim that "the insurance industry believes that car alarms work."

    Finally, it's no crime to have assets of $99 million to $318 million in 2002, as Directed founder Darrell Issa reports, all from the car alarm business. But it makes you wonder what they mean by a "grass roots effort."


    16 June 2003

    Wednesday's City Council Hearing

    On Wednesday, June 11, for four hours, the City Council's Environmental Protection Committee met to discuss New York's car alarm plague. By the end, the Committee seemed on the verge of proposing a bill to ban alarm use -- so overall, the hearing was a great success. But the response from the Mayor's office was bizarre, and threatens to complicate our efforts.

    First, I'd like to clear up a misunderstanding. When Eva Moskowitz first introduced her own car alarm bill, it looked like little more than John Liu's old bill, with a twist. Both bills would ban car alarm sales and installations in the City, while permitting alarm usage. (The Moskowitz bill would also provide a system whereby citizens could report annoying alarms to the police, prompting a form-letter to the car owner.) This is how Moskowitz described her bill to the people at TA, and how it was reported in the New York Daily News (article here).

    I was never particularly fond of this bill, since it seemed that car owners would just go to Long Island or New Jersey for their installations. Existing car alarms would remain on the streets, untouched. It's better than doing nothing, but wouldn't really solve the problem.

    Then, a couple of days before the hearing, attorney Mateo Taussig-Rubbo pointed out a section in the Moskowitz bill that I had overlooked. Her bill actually does ban alarm use outright. Despite a somewhat limited enforcement mechanism, Section 24-221(e) of her bill reads

    "[n]o owner of a motor vehicle alarm shall have in operation an audible burglar alarm or an audible status indicator."

    This put us in the nice position of pushing for something that was already on the table. In my testimony, I argued for this approach:

    "The best solution is to ban the use of car alarms in New York City. A ban would be easy for the public to understand. And it would be easy to enforce. Police officers, workers for the Department of Sanitation, and workers for the Department of Transportation could issue tickets immediately when they hear an alarm, without having to sit around timing the noise for three minutes, as the current law requires...Enforcement would involve no time-consuming and resource-consuming arguments: Did the noise last three minutes? Did the alarm go off for some legally acceptable reason? Was it bought in New York or Connecticut? The noise would just be banned.

    "And instead of sending car owners to New Jersey to buy alarms that couldn't be sold in New York, an outright ban would support local businesses that are trying to sell people silent alarms and other products that are actually effective."


    I think the Committee understood these arguments. I was generally impressed with the Councilmembers -- most of them seemed to have read TA's car alarm report, and to be familiar with the issue in their neighborhoods. By the time I spoke as part of TA's presentation, the Councilmembers themselves had made many of our points. With one exception, everyone seemed to agree that car alarms were a serious quality of life matter, and that new legislation was wanted.

    Then the Mayor's representatives spoke. Oddly enough, spokesmen for the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and for the Police Department came out against the pending car alarm bills. It's hard to figure out what they were thinking. Was it not the Mayor who launched "Operation Silent Night", to deal with issues just like car alarms? Didn't his own press release about the program say that

    "Car alarms, boom-boxes, and incomplete construction projects create unreasonable noise conditions that affect the quality of life of every New Yorker," [Mayoral aide Vinnie] La Padula said. "Today, Mayor Bloomberg continues to raise our standard of living by cracking down on noisy New Yorkers"?

    Didn't the New York Times editorial praising the initiative mention car alarms twice? Car alarms are the most public face of runaway noise in the City -- doesn't the DEP want to do something about them? Of course, the DEP is planning on rewriting the City's noise code, so maybe they will deal with the issue then. But they voiced no support for making similar legislation a part of the noise code package.

    What about the NYPD? As quoted by NY1, Assistant Commissioner Susan Petito professed to be

    "very reluctant to remove a layer of protection that's available to people, especially those people that have older cars or less expensive cars that don't have the more sophisticated anti-theft devices."

    When questioned, Ms. Petito admitted that the NYPD has no evidence that alarms work. They keep no statistics on the arrests they've made as a result of alarms (if, indeed, this has ever happened). They don't keep track of the time officers spend responding to false alarms. They admit that police officers themselves usually ignore car alarms. They are not familiar with the insurance data showing that alarms are completely ineffective. All they have are a few anecdotes from a few cops. Repeating the phrase "layer of protection" does not constitute much of an argument.

    It's possible, as Henry Stern suggested in his testimony, that the Mayor's administration simply hasn't given this issue much thought. They sent their lowest-level bureaucrats to the hearing, giving the unrevised talking points. Car alarms aren't their issue, so they don't want to be bothered.

    Conversely, the Mayor might not want a reputation as a nudge, taking away cigarettes, (purportedly) issuing more tickets, and so on. He may have thought this through, and decided that it's bad politics to support another ban. More than any other politician I've seen, Bloomberg seems to act most often on the merits of an issue. But he may be changing into a more political animal.

    Whatever his thinking, a lot of the press seems to be taking our side. See for yourself:

    NY1 (with video): "City Council Considers Ban on Car Alarms"
    CBS 2 News: "Sounds of Silence?"
    WINS Radio 1010: "New Yorkers Sound Off on Car Alarms"
    New York Daily News: "Plan for Ban Alarms Pols"
    New York Post: "Pols Weigh Car Alarm Ban"

    Perhaps the most interesting article to come of our campaign is this news story from Mobile Electronics magazine, a publication for the car alarm industry. It seems that the car alarm people are taking us very seriously. A half-dozen lobbyists from manufacturers and trade groups came out from Washington and California to give testimony at the hearing.

    In a way, they were very smart. Not one lobbyist gave any evidence that car alarms were effective at theft-prevention. Instead, they admitted the problem of false alarms, and said that they wanted to work together with the Council to make a self-policing certification system for alarm installers, to raise standards. Directed Electronics and Audiovox also touted the "safety" features of their alarms (users can push a "panic button" to set off the alarm if they feel endangered), and promised better technology to curtail false alarms.

    If this sounds familiar, it is. The car alarm industry made the same empty promises in 1997, when the City Council last considered car alarm legislation. Quoting from an article in Vision, the Consumer Electronics Association trade magazine:

    "[Some people think] that car alarms are just noisy devices that trigger any time the wind blows.

    "The latter was a central issue last year [1997] in New York City when a Brooklyn councilman introduced a bill to the city council that would ban audible car alarms. CEMA and its vehicle security members helped quash the bill by touting new technology that had been introduced to cut down on false alarms. CEMA also promoted proper security system installations by Mobile Electronics Certification Program (MECP) certified installers. Personal safety, too, was another factor CEMA used to defeat the bill, although the larger battle likely will continue."


    I've written Margarita Lopez, urging that she not let the Council be fooled by these arguments again. More than my letter, though, I hope she listens to the car alarm installers who agree that the industry's self-policing has been worthless. One installer from Jackson Heights wrote TA to say:

    "I have been in the auto alarm business for over twenty-five years, in fact that is my specialty. Most car alarms are useless, other than keeping us up at night. This is the consumers fault. The consumer looks for the cheapest alarm they can find, so what do they get a piece of junk. If I looked for the cheapest shoes, furniture, computer, air conditioner, TV, carpet, cars, etc. what would I get? Junk. Let's not buy the cheapest things and then complain about it."

    Another installer, Micah Sheveloff, gave very powerful testimony at the hearing, saying:

    "Commerce has been put before proper procedure. The automotive aftermarket industry has been allowed to police itself since its inception, and the lack of manufacturing and installation standards has not only caused car alarms to become a nuisance, but has allowed thieves to more easily defeat the systems as well, tarnishing the reputation of the entire product category. Currently, alarm systems are available to anyone for purchase (uninstalled) in stores and on the Internet, even by such nationally reputable firms as Crutchfield. Installation is left up to the consumer. In most states, a car alarm shop can and will hire anyone, regardless of experience level, to install these devices.

    "Car alarms are NOT do-it-yourself items. They should not be installed by untrained novice installers. With the complexity and vulnerability of today's automotive electrical systems, there is no reason that some form of licensing or certification should not be required and enforced, and the aftermarket industry SHOULD have seen to that years ago. Those are the type of regulations or laws that we should be considering here today.[...]

    "Manufacturers may preach about their dealer training programs and about how aware they are that quality installations count, but the bottom line is the bottom line with these companies. [...] As long as the consumer perceives that a car alarm is a $199 installed commodity, all of these problems will persist."


    Finally, I'd like to mention the great number of ordinary citizens who came to testify at the hearing. Richard Tur spoke very well, and later provided two of the video and audio links above. One woman said that she had called her insurance agent to discover that her car alarm discount would be worth $1.20 every six months. She generously offered to give $2.40 a year to the City in exchange for a ban on alarms. Not one car owner came to support the alarms (alarm owners probably aren't the most civic-minded people).

    What's next? We might get one of the newspapers to run an Op-Ed about car alarms. We might get a polling firm to survey New Yorkers about their attitudes towards car alarm legislation. Send your comments and ideas to aaron@silentmajorityny.org


    12 June 2003
    Yesterday, for four hours, the City Council's Environmental Protection Committee met to discuss the car alarm plague. Councilmembers were much more informed than I had expected, whereas the Mayor's office...but I'll write up the details this weekend.


    02 June 2003
    City Council has scheduled a hearing on car alarms for next week. I'm amazed that they're moving so quickly. If you want to make a difference in the campaign, click on "Get Involved", and come to the meetings!


    20 May 2003
    The website is online! Please send comments to aaron@silentmajorityny.org.